<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Missing Value of Open Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://developers.sugarcrm.com/wordpress/2008/02/13/missing-value-of-open-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://developers.sugarcrm.com/wordpress/2008/02/13/missing-value-of-open-source/</link>
	<description>Weblog for the Sugar Developer community</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: clintoram</title>
		<link>http://developers.sugarcrm.com/wordpress/2008/02/13/missing-value-of-open-source/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>clintoram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developers.sugarcrm.com/wordpress/?p=76#comment-61</guid>
		<description>As always, we certainly appreciate constructive feedback and are continuously work on improving our communication.

Clint</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, we certainly appreciate constructive feedback and are continuously work on improving our communication.</p>
<p>Clint</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SugarDev.net</title>
		<link>http://developers.sugarcrm.com/wordpress/2008/02/13/missing-value-of-open-source/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>SugarDev.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developers.sugarcrm.com/wordpress/?p=76#comment-40</guid>
		<description>You certainly have a point. However, I think SugarCRM still doesn't quite get it...It's been said before over and over again:

- A public subversion repository
- A mailing list (the Developers forum just isn't quite sufficient)
- A working bug system (I have submitted bugs that are still "Open" after more then a year)
- A team that actually responds to comments

I do think that quite a lot of open source minded folks don't see Sugar as a 'real' open source project. And that's why there's so little input and you still have to code yourself.

PS: I see that your code contribution form was off line for 2-3 months before you noticed that it actually was. Nuff said I think..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You certainly have a point. However, I think SugarCRM still doesn&#8217;t quite get it&#8230;It&#8217;s been said before over and over again:</p>
<p>- A public subversion repository<br />
- A mailing list (the Developers forum just isn&#8217;t quite sufficient)<br />
- A working bug system (I have submitted bugs that are still &#8220;Open&#8221; after more then a year)<br />
- A team that actually responds to comments</p>
<p>I do think that quite a lot of open source minded folks don&#8217;t see Sugar as a &#8216;real&#8217; open source project. And that&#8217;s why there&#8217;s so little input and you still have to code yourself.</p>
<p>PS: I see that your code contribution form was off line for 2-3 months before you noticed that it actually was. Nuff said I think..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
