Comments for Sugar Developer Blog

Comment on SugarCRM Custom Masked Input field by John

John — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:55:36 +0000

I’ve looked through all the files and I can’t see why this module wouldn’t work in 5.2. Except for the fact that the manifest declares 5.5.0 as the minimum version, I can’t see why this wouldn’t apply. I really appreciate the post, but I don’t want to have to recode everything individually. Any danger in changing the manifest to include 5.2 as a supported version?

Comment on SugarCRM now in the Windows Web App Gallery by Jose Sambrano

Jose Sambrano — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:05:54 +0000

Does Sugarcrm support MSSQL 2008? or just MSSQL 2005 ??

Comment on SugarCRM Custom Masked Input field by ruchida

ruchida — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:30:33 +0000

Great post, Ken.

This will inspire developers much.

Comment on SugarCRM Custom Masked Input field by Xavier

Xavier — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:22:03 +0000

We i said we I mean SYNOLIA

Comment on SugarCRM Custom Masked Input field by Xavier

Xavier — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:20:59 +0000

We are actually developping such Field feature…It should be available on SugarForge next week

Comment on SugarCRM Custom Masked Input field by Loek van Gool

Loek van Gool — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:09:29 +0000

Why are you putting the new SugarField in include/SugarFields/Fields? Since 5.5, custom/include/SugarFields/Fields is supported..

Comment on See “Connect your data to the outside world with SugarCRM connectors” on IBM Developerworks by Giorgio Sotgiu

Giorgio Sotgiu — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:23:19 +0000

hi, i’m a developer, my question is i can and how is possible to connect a outlook address book to SugarCRM (on os windows or Linux) ? I can use PHP, Visual Studio VB.NET or Gambas2 as develop language.

Thanks

Giorgio Sotgiu

p.s. SugarCRM is an atomic system i mind !

Comment on Smarty or PHP as a templating language? by Tim Turner

Tim Turner — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:03:45 +0000

I have to agree with David on this, I’ve always felt the template engines should be used for parsing content, specifically.

Adding in the additional fuss from a whole programming language just adds to the page load.

Also, I feel like, in some cases, it can result in even more “unclean” code because of the way customizations may have to be done on certain modules or included objects.

For example, I just customized the ‘Datetimecombo’ object adding the ability to set a default time. It was quite daunting to have to code between PHP, JavaScript, basic HTML, and the Smarty engine. I know for a fact that the solution I came up with was not as efficient or UI friendly as I would have hoped for.

That’s not to say Smarty is useless or doesn’t work. Just feel it to be a bit too deep into the logic side of things, rather then focusing on better parsing procedures.

Comment on Wrapping up first version of Sugar Developer Guide by Jeff Walters

Jeff Walters — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:27:58 +0000

Would love to give it a once over.

Comment on Quick ListView customization by christian

christian — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:29:26 +0000

Hello, I am new in Sugar, I am interesting to get a proper display in my contact list. I followed the instruction, but get this error message.
Any ideas?

thank you.
Christian.

Warning: Smarty error: unable to read resource: “custom/modules/Contacts/tpls/ListViewContacts.tpl” in /home/tccwebsi/public_html/sugar/include/Smarty/Smarty.class.php on line 1095